which file checkes for serial number crazytalk pipeline

#Which file checkes for serial number crazytalk pipeline serial
#Which file checkes for serial number crazytalk pipeline trial

Malone agrees, and says the 'prior literature that was put out by the people that developed ' acknowledges this risk. 14:40 Bret: if the protein lodged in 'the membrane of the cells doing the transcribing' as intended, it would be a lot less destructive Dr.'Their determination was, they didn't think that was sufficient documentation of the risk that the spike was biologically active.' ( edit: a least 4 fact checkers reject this) Malone: 'The spike protein itself, we now know, is cytotoxic' (and 'very dangerous', adds Bret) and Malone alerted the FDA about this risk 'months and months and months ago, and we had a discussion'. 14:02 The FDA knew about the biodistribution, and it's most concentrated in the ovaries ( edit: this is false), though the FDA did not believe it was dangerous at the time. 12:30 Steve heard from to Byram Bridle about how, according to Japanese Government data, the spike protein generated by 'the vaccine' doesn't stay in the arm like a typical vaccine, but spreads throughout the body.(my thought: a 'bad batch' could explain clustering in Steve's community) This was like 'lightning striking twice', 'impossible' if the vaccine is safe. Meanwhile, his wife started to suffered from serious hand shaking after taking the vaccine. 11:12 Steve became interested in the issue of vaccine safety because he talked to his carpet cleaner, who said he had a 'heart attack' two minutes after taking the Pfizer vaccine and was 'still feeling bad about it' (18:40 he talks about these side effects, how the press ignores victims of serious side effects, and how this has cost his carpet cleaner $30,000).( edit: the original article was removed from there, albeit still accessible via direct link, and was later put behind a paywall with Kirsch's name removed.)

#Which file checkes for serial number crazytalk pipeline trial

Here is a list of Steve's (seven) articles in Trial Site News. 8:00 Bret gushes in the beginning about Steve's 'article in Trial Site News'.3:40 Prophylactic ivermectin is about '100% effective at preventing people from contracting Covid when taken properly' (an 'Argentina study' is mentioned in support of this).Summary of the video's main points & discussions: Steve frequently interrupts the other two, but at least seems very knowledgeable and well-connected (not to mention wealthy).Īt first I was going to make this a 'question', but there's a lot to unpack and I think it could generate a lot of discussion, so I made it a 'post' instead.

#Which file checkes for serial number crazytalk pipeline serial

Finally there's Steve Kirsch, a red-tribey-sounding serial entrepreneur who mostly does tech firms but has been 'researching adverse reactions to COVID vaccines'. The video description says Robert Malone is 'the inventor of mRNA Vaccine technology' he doesn't have a Wikipedia page, but he is mentioned on the page about mRNA vaccines as having 'developed a high-efficiency in-vitro and in-vivo RNA transfection system using cationic liposomes, which were used 'to directly introduce RNA into whole tissues and embryos', as well as various cells types' in 1989. It's hosted by Bret Weinstein who (says Wikipedia) 'came to national attention during the 2017 Evergreen State College protests' and 'is among the people referred to collectively as the 'intellectual dark web''. While the video is extremely long, the most controversial claims come near the beginning. While the LessWrong community isn't known for its expertise in vaccine science and epidemiology, it's usually pretty good about separating the true from the false, so here I am to ask for your comments. Well, move over lab-leak discussion, because this video is a tad more explosive: it alleges an ongoing and almost systematic censorship of information about vaccine side-effects, and it manages to do so in a way that fails to trip my BS detectors.

One month ago I clumsily tried to persuade my 74-year-old father that Tucker Carlson is probably wrong about Covid vaccines killing 3000 people, and if not, my father should get the vaccine anyway because he is in a high-risk group.